Aleven, V. A. W. M. M. & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179. 

Atkinson, R.C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes. In K. W. Spence, & J. Taylor Spence (Hrsg.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2. Auflage), (S. 89–195). Academic Press.

Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’ expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300.  

Biggs, J. B. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. What the student does (4. Aufl.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Bohl, T. & Wacker, A. (2016). Ergebnisse der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung der Gemeinschaftsschule in Baden-Württemberg. Lehren und Lernen. 42(5), 29–35. 

Wacker, A. & Bohl, T. (2016). Schulsystem und Gemeinschaftsschule in Baden-Württemberg. In Bohl, T./Wacker, A. (Hrsg.), Die Einführung der Gemeinschaftsschule in Baden-Württemberg. Abschlussbericht der wissenschaftlichen Begleitforschung (WissGem). Münster: Waxmann, S. 27–46. 

Bohl, T., Wacker, A., Batzel-Kremer, A., Bennemann, E., Hahn, El., Haupt-Mukrowsky, K., Heller, F., Meissner, S., & Schäfer, L. (2017). Die Studie 'Wissenschaftliche Begleitung Gemeinschaftsschule in Baden-Württemberg (WissGem)': Design, Befunde und Empfehlungen. In J. Zykla (Hrsg.), Schule auf dem Weg zur personalisierten Lernumgebung. Modell des neuen Lehrens und Lernens (S. 43-58). Beltz.

Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.  

Cramer, C., Harant, M., Merk, S., Drahmann, M. & Emmerich, M. (2019). Meta-Reflexivität und Professionalität im Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerberuf. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 65(3), 401–423.

Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66. 

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. 

Fütterer T., Hoch E., Stürmer K., Lachner A., Fischer C., &Scheiter K. (2021). Was bewegt Lehrpersonen während der Schulschließungen? – Eine Analyse der Kommunikation im Twitter-Lehrerzimmer über Chancen und Herausforderungen digitalen Unterrichts. Zeitschrift für Erziehwissenschaften, 24(2), 443–477. doi: 10.1007/s11618-021-01013-8 

Fütterer, T., Scheiter, K., Cheng, X., & Stürmer, K. (2022). Quality beats frequency? Investigating students’ effort in learning when introducing technology in classrooms. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102042 

Fütterer, T., Scheiter, K., Cheng, X., Stürmer, K. ( Quality beats frequency? Investigating students’ effort in learning when introducing technology in classrooms. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Jg. 69, April 2022. Online unter: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102042 (letzter Zugriff:  

Furtak, E. M., et al. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44(3), 267–291.

Gagné, R. M. (1974). Educational Technology and the Learning Process. American Educational Research Association, 3(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X003001004 

Gijlers, H. & de Jong, T. (2013). Using Concept Maps to Facilitate Collaborative Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 340–374.  

Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001 

Hannus, M. & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of Illustrations during Learning of Science Textbook Passages among Low- and High-Ability Children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 95–123.  

Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742. 

Hammer, M., Göllner, R., Scheiter, K., Fauth, B., & Stürmer, K. (2021). For whom do tablets make a difference? Examining student profiles and perceptions of instruction with tablets. Computers & Education, 166, 104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104147   

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487  

Heinen, R., & Kerres, M. (2015). Individuelle Förderung mit digitalen Medien. Handlungsfelder für systematische, lernförderliche Integration digitaler Medien in Schule und Unterricht. Im Auftrag der Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_IB_iFoerderung_digitale_Medien_2015.pdf (letzter Zugriff: 13.11.2023).  

Heitmann, S., Grund, A., Berthold, K., Fries, S., & Roelle, J. (2018). Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2596. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02596 

Honegger, Beat Döbeli. Mehr als 0 und 1 (E-Book) : Schule in einer digitalisierten Welt, hep verlag, 2017. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unitueb/detail.action?docID=5023792 

Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006.  

Kiili, K., Moeller, K., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of a game-based rational number training-In-game metrics as learning indicators. Computers & Education, 120, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.012

Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Stürmer, K. (2019). A test-based approach of modeling and measuring technological pedagogical knowledge. Computers & Education, 142, 103645. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103645 

Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, T., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304

Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. 

Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S. & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Educations, 95, 174–187. 

Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology. A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003449

Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2015). Eye-movement modeling of integrative reading of an illustrated text: Effects on processing and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 172–187. 

Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 901–918.  
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037123 

Mayer, R. (2005). Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning: Segmenting, Pretraining, and Modality Principles. The Cambrigde Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambrigde University Press. 

Niegemann, H. M. (2004). Modelle des Instruktionsdesigns. Zu Möglichkeiten und Grenzen  didaktischer Hilfestellungen. In U. Rinn & D. M. Meister (Hrsg.), Didaktik und Neue Medien – Konzepte und Anwendungen in der Hochschule (S. 102–122). Waxmann. 

Pai, H. H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-analysis. Educational psychology review, 27, 79-102. 

Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 216–237.  

Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to Collaborate. An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2  

Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2015). Picture or text first? Explaining sequence effects when learning with pictures and text. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 153–180. 

Seel, H. (1999). Allgemeine Didaktik (General Didactics) and Fachdidaktik (Subject Didactics). In B. Hudson, F. Buchberger, P. Kansanen & H. Seel (Hrsg.), Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as Science(-s) of the teaching profession? (S. 13–20). Umeå.  

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. 

Sibley, L., Lachner, A., Plicht, C., Fabian, A., Backfisch, I., Scheiter, K. & Bohl, T. (sub.). Feasibility of adaptive teaching with technology: Which implementation conditions matter? Computers & Education. 

Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, (24), 86–97. 

Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J. & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–762. 

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (S. 37–76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8 

Tarmizi, R., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Education & Psychology, 80, 424–436. 

Merriënboer, J. J. G. van, Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 39–64.

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher- student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 46–57. 

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F. & Beishuizen, J.(2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43, 615–641. 

Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511. 

Wagner, S., Schneider, S., Backfisch, I., Scheiter, K., & Lachner, A. (under review). Does Computer-Based Feedback Foster Expository Writing? A Meta-Analysis, Educational Psychology Review.   

Vygotsky, L. S. (1974). The Psychology of Art. MIT Press.

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K. & Hattie, J. (2020). The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087.  

Zhu, C., & Urhahne, D. (2018). The use of learner response systems in the classroom enhances teachers' judgment accuracy. Learning and Instruction, 58, 255–262.